Divorce | Personal Injury Lawyer Plantation |

  • Remember the day you tied the knot?

  • We'll help you forget it.

    Bold Justice


Child Custody & Time Sharing

Ft. Lauderdale family law and divorce attorneys Sean L. Collin and Philip M. Snyder have extensive experience representing individuals in child custody related matters. Mr. Collin and Mr. Snyder have represented individuals in over 300 divorce related matters from professional athletes to high net worth executives.

The most expensive and difficult divorces are the ones that involve child custody/time sharing. The divorce lawyers at Lyons, Snyder & Collin, P.A. utilize all the tools at their disposal to achieve the best possible results for their clients because the time that you spend with your child is “priceless”.

know the law

In 2008, the laws were amended regarding the residential placement of minor children in divorce and paternity cases.  Courts now must look to establish (or modify) parental responsibility through the adoption of a “parenting plan.”  Florida Statute, Section 61.13(3) spells out the factors to be considered by the court:

  1. The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing parent-child relationship, to honor the time-sharing schedule, and to be reasonable when changes are required.
  2. The anticipated division of parental responsibilities after the litigation, including the extent to which parental responsibilities will be delegated to third parties.
  3. The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to determine, consider, and act upon the needs of the child as opposed to the needs or desires of the parent.
  4. The length of time the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining continuity.
  5. The geographic viability of the parenting plan, with special attention paid to the needs of school-age children and the amount of time to be spent traveling to effectuate the parenting plan. This factor does not create a presumption for or against relocation of either parent with a child.
  6. The moral fitness of the parents.
  7. The mental and physical health of the parents.
  8. The home, school, and community record of the child.
  9. The reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of sufficient intelligence, understanding, and experience to express a preference.
  10. The demonstrated knowledge, capacity, and disposition of each parent to be informed of the circumstances of the minor child, including, but not limited to, the child’s friends, teachers, medical care providers, daily activities, and favorite things.
  11. The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to provide a consistent routine for the child, such as discipline, and daily schedules for homework, meals, and bedtime.
  12. The demonstrated capacity of each parent to communicate with and keep the other parent informed of issues and activities regarding the minor child, and the willingness of each parent to adopt a unified front on all major issues when dealing with the child.
  13. Evidence of domestic violence, sexual violence, child abuse, child abandonment, or child neglect, regardless of whether a prior or pending action relating to those issues has been brought. If the court accepts evidence of prior or pending actions regarding domestic violence, sexual violence, child abuse, child abandonment, or child neglect, the court must specifically acknowledge in writing that such evidence was considered when evaluating the best interests of the child.
  14. Evidence that either parent has knowingly provided false information to the court regarding any prior or pending action regarding domestic violence, sexual violence, child abuse, child abandonment, or child neglect.
  15. The particular parenting tasks customarily performed by each parent and the division of parental responsibilities before the institution of litigation and during the pending litigation, including the extent to which parenting responsibilities were undertaken by third parties.
  16. The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to participate and be involved in the child’s school and extracurricular activities.
  17. The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to maintain an environment for the child which is free from substance abuse.
  18. The capacity and disposition of each parent to protect the child from the ongoing litigation as demonstrated by not discussing the litigation with the child, not sharing documents or electronic media related to the litigation with the child, and refraining from disparaging comments about the other parent to the child.
  19. The developmental stages and needs of the child and the demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to meet the child’s developmental needs.
  20. Any other factor that is relevant to the determination of a specific parenting plan, including the time-sharing schedule.

The Ft. Lauderdale family law and divorce lawyers at Lyons, Snyder & Collin, P.A. are knowledgeable regarding all of these factors in determining child custody/time sharing and are able to effectively advocate on your behalf in order to obtain the best possible result for you and your children.

Contact the Fort Lauderdale family law and divorce attorneys at Lyons, Snyder & Collin, P.A. 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at 954.462.8035 for your free consultation.

Have a legal question? Don't have time to call?

Ask an Attorney

Recent Child Custody & Time Sharing Articles

View All